5/8/2023 0 Comments Impact client binds![]() ![]() To make the client-side app interactive, Vue needs to perform the hydration step. The HTML is completely static on the client since we are not loading Vue in the browser. If you click the button, you'll notice the number doesn't change. Js import express from ' express ' import )įinally, run node server.js and visit You should see the page working with the button. Add "type": "module" in package.json so that Node.js runs in ES modules mode.Let's take a look at the most bare-bones example of Vue SSR in action. In fact, this website you are reading right now is statically generated using VitePress, a Vue-powered static site generator. SSG is also great for content-based websites such as documentation sites or blogs. , /about, /contact, etc.), then you probably want SSG instead of SSR. If you're only investigating SSR to improve the SEO of a handful of marketing pages (e.g. Every time the data changes, a new deployment is needed. data that is known at build time and does not change between deploys. The keyword here is static: SSG can only be applied to pages consuming static data, i.e. At the same time, it is cheaper and easier to deploy than SSR apps because the output is static HTML and assets. SSG retains the same performance characteristics of SSR apps: it provides great time-to-content performance. Pre-rendered pages are generated and served as static HTML files. If the data needed to server-render a page is the same for every user, then instead of rendering the page every time a request comes in, we can render it only once, ahead of time, during the build process. Static Site Generation (SSG), also referred to as pre-rendering, is another popular technique for building fast websites. However, in cases where time-to-content is absolutely critical, SSR can help you achieve the best possible initial load performance. For example, if you are building an internal dashboard where an extra few hundred milliseconds on initial load doesn't matter that much, SSR would be an overkill. It mostly depends on how important time-to-content is for your app. Rendering a full app in Node.js is going to be more CPU-intensive than just serving static files, so if you expect high traffic, be prepared for corresponding server load and wisely employ caching strategies.īefore using SSR for your app, the first question you should ask is whether you actually need it. Unlike a fully static SPA that can be deployed on any static file server, a server-rendered app requires an environment where a Node.js server can run. More involved build setup and deployment requirements. ![]() ![]() Browser-specific code can only be used inside certain lifecycle hooks some external libraries may need special treatment to be able to run in a server-rendered app. There are also some trade-offs to consider when using SSR:ĭevelopment constraints. This means if you have content fetched asynchronously on pages where SEO is important, SSR might be necessary. If your app starts with a loading spinner, then fetches content via Ajax, the crawler will not wait for you to finish. Unified mental model: you get to use the same language and the same declarative, component-oriented mental model for developing your entire app, instead of jumping back and forth between a backend templating system and a frontend framework.īetter SEO: the search engine crawlers will directly see the fully rendered page.Īs of now, Google and Bing can index synchronous JavaScript applications just fine. This generally results in improved Core Web Vitals metrics, better user experience, and can be critical for applications where time-to-content is directly associated with conversion rate. In addition, data fetching is done on the server-side for the initial visit, which likely has a faster connection to your database than the client. Server-rendered markup doesn't need to wait until all JavaScript has been downloaded and executed to be displayed, so your user will see a fully-rendered page sooner. Why SSR? Ĭompared to a client-side Single-Page Application (SPA), the advantage of SSR primarily lies in:įaster time-to-content: this is more prominent on slow internet or slow devices. However, it is also possible to render the same components into HTML strings on the server, send them directly to the browser, and finally "hydrate" the static markup into a fully interactive app on the client.Ī server-rendered Vue.js app can also be considered "isomorphic" or "universal", in the sense that the majority of your app's code runs on both the server and the client. By default, Vue components produce and manipulate DOM in the browser as output. Vue.js is a framework for building client-side applications. Server-Side Rendering (SSR) Overview What is SSR? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |